The Online Photographer had a post a few days ago -- about photography, about cameras, about seeing the world. I really recommend it. You can find it here.
quote:
"When they look at your work, nobody cares what brand camera you used, and you don’t get any credit one way or the other (i.e., positive or negative) for the name on the box you happen to choose. What you want from a camera is for it to be "good enough.” Beyond that, I’m here to tell you that the next incremental improvement in your work is not going to come from buying a slightly better box."

I really dig this -- the idea that art and creativity have less to do with the tools used, and more to do with the ability of the artist to convey a feeling or a mood, or simply reflect the scene. This applies to oils, to watercolor, to charcoal, to pastels. But mostly it should apply to photography, especially digital photography... when the next big thing is just around the corner, and it can run around a thousand dollars, but probably more.
TOP goes on to say:
"Photography is all about looking: looking at the world, and looking at pictures. It’s not about cameras. Well, it is, but it only begins with the camera. It doesn’t end there. Shooting skills, visual sensitivity, craft and technique have more to do with how good your pictures will look than the brand name on the box."
Enough said. Of course, I have the new Canon 5D Mk II, so I suppose I shouldn't really be talking. Then again, the major difference in my camera upgrade is the size of the file and the size of the print. The quality's better, of course, but it's still up to me to create the image. To find the location, to work the scene, to determine point of view, and depth of field, and so on. The camera doesn't do any of that for me. I do.